Declassified UK: The Not-At-All ‘Impartial’ BBC

Posted: 1st October 2026

The Not-At-All ‘Impartial’ BBC 

Des Freedman

Regular Contributor
Declassified UK

Supporters of Declassified UK will have long ago turned away from the BBC as a source of reliable or impartial information about British foreign policy.

But new research from Ofcom shows that the BBC remains by far the most widely-used news outlet in the UK. It reaches more than three-quarters of all adults and is the main source of news across all major social media platforms.

The BBC remains, therefore, an influential gatekeeper of coverage of the state’s activities across the globe.

When the UK government agreed on 21 September 2026 to help refuel Saudi jets attacking the Houthis in Yemen, the BBC uncritically repeated the defence minister’s ludicrous claim that this was for “purely defensive” missions.

Rather than highlighting the inflammatory possibilities of further UK involvement in the region, its security correspondent Frank Gardner simply described the military support on 5 Live that evening as “performative”.

He then confidently asserted, without rebuttal, that “it isn’t Britain going to war in Yemen although it may well be seen like that because, let’s face it, this is Britain taking sides”.

“Taking sides” is what leading BBC journalists seem very comfortable with, particularly when it comes to platforming Israeli voices.

For example, Justin Webb interviewed Elan Carr, head of the Israeli-American Council on the BBC’s “flagship” Today programme on 16 September after the latter had called for the pro-Palestine rapper Macklemore to be dropped from Ed Sheeran’s US tour.

Webb sat back and allowed Carr to claim – without being challenged – that “‘Free Palestine’ absolutely is a call for the extermination of the state of Israel and the Jewish people.”

The following weekend, “star” BBC presenter Laura Kuennsberg asked whether it was right “for people who are singers, songwriters, artists to be taking public positions on very very controversial, difficult, complicated issues?”

She did not ask this question after Ed Sheeran performed at the “Concert for Ukraine” back in 2022.

Yet, for millions of people, genocide isn’t a “controversial” or “complicated” issue but a war crime that they would expect news organisations to name and to seek to hold the perpetrators to account.

Help us reach 5,000 monthly donors

Regular monthly donations keep us independent, and fearless.

Instead, the BBC seems determined to go in the opposite direction.

In early September 2026, when Katty Kay, the Corporation’s US special correspondent referred on a non-BBC podcast to the “genocide” being committed by Israel, the BBC responded that the comment “did not meet our editorial standards”.

When large sections of the news media now talk about the “Gaza health ministry”, the BBC continues to refer to it as “Hamas-run”, adding however that its figures “are considered reliable by the UN”.

Even though, according to the Palestine Football Association, 568 Palestinian footballers have been killed by Israeli forces since 7 October 2023, the BBC published a lengthy article on 17 September on the travails of Israel’s under-20 football team without once mentioning these fatalities.

This kind of coverage doesn’t reflect mainstream UK public opinion which is strongly against Israel’s actions in Gaza and the West Bank.

In fact, in the context of Macklemore being dropped from Ed Sheeran’s tour for his pro-Palestine views, the only constituencies who think it’s unacceptable for musicians to make “political statements” (and who believe it was right for Macklemore to have been dropped) are Conservative and Reform voters.

That’s who the BBC appears to be tailing.

Want to share The Brief from Hamza Yusuf with someone?
Encourage them to sign up for this regular newsletter at www.declassifieduk.org/newsletter