Posted: 31st August 2023
War In Ukraine/NATO
AUKUS
UK Nuclear Energy
Nuclear Energy
Fukushima
Radioactivity
Letter
A letter submitted to The Guardian from Linda Walker responding to Swedish climate activist’s call to Greenpeace to drop its opposition to nuclear power:
It is disappointing to see that some of our most dedicated young climate activists have been convinced by the highly funded stream of propaganda put out by the nuclear industry.
(Young Climate Activist tells Greenpeace to drop ‘old fashioned’ anti nuclear stance, August 29th)
If the development of new nuclear power was really a viable part of the solution to climate change, then I am sure Greenpeace and many others would swallow their objections in order to tackle the greater challenge.
But it is not. As the Greenpeace EU spokesperson noted, it is fiendishly expensive and takes a very long time to build. The Olkiluoto 3 plant in Finland began producing electricity for the grid this spring, 14 years behind schedule and at 11 Billion Euros, three times over budget. A nuclear power plant is about four times the cost of the equivalent wind farms and takes at least five times as long to build. We do not have this time to spare if we are to urgently tackle the climate crisis.
Greenpeace is absolutely right to challenge the EU’s acceptance of nuclear power as a green source of energy – against the wishes of its elected MPs – as this will divert the funds needed to develop genuine renewables into massive nuclear subsidies, Many states in the US have put billions of dollars into propping up unprofitable nuclear plants under programmes which were designed to develop clean energy solutions
Nuclear power and nuclear weapons are inextricably interlinked. France was motivated to develop its nuclear power industry largely to make sure that its nuclear weapons could be produced independently of the US. And it has been acknowledged that one of the reasons for building the much delayed Hinkley C power station is to maintain a body of skills which is needed for our Trident nuclear weapons system.
There is still no answer to how to deal with the waste. When accidents happen, such as Chernobyl and Fukushima, they are devastating. And we have all watched in horror as the war in Ukraine threatens the Zaporozhye nuclear plants.
It is time we redirected the resources we are squandering on nuclear power towards the development of clean renewable technologies, better storage and home insulation to reduce our energy demands. All this would create far more jobs as well as providing a safer future for us all. [ENDS]