Digital ID: the debate returns

In the past 20 years, our lives have technologically transformed. Life has become increasingly digitised and in a world of online shopping, banking, and streaming, proving who we are in a safe and secure way has become a vital need. The case for a trusted form of digital ID, which can help us access digital public services and prove who we are online, has shifted. However, crucially, the human rights concerns associated with such a scheme remain the same. The extent of these risks and the opportunities of a digital ID system entirely depend on the policy choices the government makes.   

Where does Liberty stand on this? 

Liberty has long opposed the introduction of compulsory identity cards. A compulsory system would fundamentally change the relationship between individual and state. It would also exclude the most vulnerable members of our society. We must always retain the right to verify our identity offline to limit the harms of this digital exclusion.  

There are concerning rumours circulating that the current government wants to develop plans around digital ID cards as a way to reduce migration. A digital ID system designed to reduce irregular migration would be plagued by human rights and discriminatory problems. It would give the Home Office huge surveillance powers during a time of increasing mass surveillance. 

We hope that the Government learns from the mistakes of the 2000s and the good work done in Europe and beyond to develop rights-respecting ID systems. Digital ID could be an essential tool for every digital citizen, or a nightmarish surveillance system. We’re watching closely as the Government develops its proposals. Liberty will be ready to respond and to push for a system that protects and respects everyone’s rights. 

Best wishes, 

Anna Cardoso,

Policy & Campaigns Officer