Weapons & National Security
Posted: 9th November 2025
LABOUR’S “national security threat” attacks on the SNP reveal how
deeply embedded support for nuclear weapons has become in UK politics, a
leading security academic has said. Nick Ritchie, a professor of
international security at the University of York, said that by branding
opposition to Trident as a danger to the nation, ministers risk “shutting
down” democratic debate on defence. Ritchie, who last year led research
on international nuclear security for the New Zealand government, spoke to
the Sunday National after Labour ministers ramped up their rhetoric against
the Scottish Government, suggesting it poses a bigger danger to UK
interests than China. In the past week, Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy,
Scottish Secretary Douglas Alexander, and Defence Secretary John Healey
have all described the SNP administration as a “threat” to UK national
security. The Labour ministers’ arguments hinge on the SNP’s opposition to
nuclear weaponry, which Ritchie said “really reduces how you can talk and
think about national security”. He suggested that national security was
being “conflated with unequivocal support for nuclear weapons”. RITCHIE
said the “weird thing” is that the UK Government is technically legally
bound “under the Non-Proliferation Treaty to work towards the goal of
nuclear disarmament”. He went on: “Of course, the caveat is that the
time is not right now, it’ll be far too difficult and so on and so forth.
But the premise – that nuclear disarmament is where we need to end up – is
a premise that is accepted, or has been accepted, by governments of all
stripes. “So there’s a tension there between accepting that on the one
hand and then chastising the SNP for a pretty legitimate position that
nuclear weapons are a security liability. This is the position that the
majority of countries in the world have taken.”
The National 9th Nov 2025
https://www.thenational.scot/news/25606016.weird-catch-labours-national-security-threat-attack-snp/